|
Commission Comment: As stated in its preamble, the Covenant,
a "mutually binding" document, "establish[es]
a self-governing commonwealth for the Northern Mariana Islands
within the American political system and . . . define[s] the
. . . relationship between the Northern Mariana Islands and
the United States."
The Covenant was negotiated over the course of twenty-seven
months (December 1972 to February 1975) by the Marianas
Political Status Commission (an organization representing
the Northern Mariana Islands) and a delegation representing
the United States. The proposed Covenant was signed by negotiators
on February 15, 1975, at Saipan. (See text following Section
1005.)
The Covenant was subsequently approved, pursuant to the
steps specified in Section 1001, as follows:
On February 20, 1975, the Covenant was submitted to and
approved (unanimously) by the Mariana Islands District Legislature
of the United Nations Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
On June 17, 1975, the Covenant was submitted to the people
of the Northern Mariana Islands voters in a plebiscite.
At the time, 95 percent of eligible voters had registered
to vote. Of the 95 percent of all registered voters who
cast ballots in the plebiscite, 78.8 percent voted to approve
the Covenant.
After the results of the plebiscite were certified to the
President of the United States, the Covenant was approved
by joint resolution adopted by the U.S. House of Representatives
on July 21, 1975, and the U.S. Senate on February 24, 1976.
On March 24, 1976, President Gerald Ford signed the resolution,
which thereupon became U.S. Public Law 94-241, 90 Stat.
263.
Pursuant to Section 1003(a), some Covenant provisions became
effective on March 24, 1976, the date of final approval.
Remaining provisions took effect on January 9, 1978, and
November 4, 1986, the dates specified in Presidential proclamations
issued pursuant to Section 1003(b)-(c). On the latter date,
qualified residents of the Northern Mariana Islands became
U.S. citizens.
According to Section 105, many specified "fundamental"
Covenant provisions may be modified only with the joint
consent of the U.S. and Commonwealth governments. Other
provisions may be unilaterally amended by the U.S. government.
In U.S. Public Law 98-213, enacted in 1983, Congress unilaterally
amended Section 606(b), a non-fundamental provision concerning
Social Security taxes and benefits. (See note following
Section 606.) As of January 1997, that enactment remains
the only express amendment of any Covenant provision.
U.S. Public Law 94-241, the measure approving the Covenant,
was originally reprinted in the U.S. Code in a note under
48 U.S.C. § 1681. In an official edition of the U.S.
Code published in 1986, several provisions of the act were
codified (as amended) as 48 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1805.
(See also C-201 et seq.)
§ 1801. Approval of Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands
The Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States
of America, the text of which is as follows, is hereby approved.
Source: U.S. Public Law 94-241, § 1, Mar. 24, 1976,
90 Stat. 263.
Case Annotations: Wabol v. Villacrusis, 1 N.M.I. 34--40,
41, 49, 50; Mafnas v. Superior Ct., 1 N.M.I. 277--281 (1990)
appeal dismissed, 936 F.2d 1068 (9th Cir. 1991); Aldan-Pierce
v. Mafnas, 2 N.M.I. 122--132, 133 (1991), rev'd, 31 F.3d
756 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. ___, 115 S.
Ct. 913, 130 L. Ed. 2d 794 (1995); Sablan v. Inos, 2 N.M.I.
388--392, 393; Sablan v. Inos, 3 N.M.I. 418--426; Sablan
v. Tenorio, 4 N.M.I. 351--361, 365, 367, 368, 369, 372,
373, 374, 376.
Nature and Effect of Covenant
—Generally
The entire relationship between the United States and the
Commonwealth is governed by the Covenant. Sablan v. Inos,
3 N.M.I. 418 (1993).
The Covenant is not a unilateral enactment by the U.S.
Congress. It is not an organic act, which Congress may unilaterally
change at its pleasure. Because the Covenant is a binding
bilateral agreement between the U.S. and the people of the
NMI, neither party may unilaterally amend Covenant's fundamental
provisions without the consent of the other. To do so would
constitute a material breach of the Covenant. Sablan v.
Inos, 3 N.M.I. 418 (1993).
In entering into the Covenant, the U.S. fulfilled its United
Nations Trusteeship obligation to have the people of the
NMI exercise their inherent right of self-determination.
The people of the NMI entered into the Covenant to become
a self-governing commonwealth in political union with and
under the sovereignty of the U.S.; they did not enter into
the Covenant to become a territory or possession of the
U.S., as those terms are used in the U.S. Constitution.
In interpreting the Covenant, the aspirations of the people
of the NMI and the purpose for which the U.S. entered into
the Covenant should be kept in mind. Sablan v. Inos, 3 N.M.I.
418 (1993).
Covenant § 101 places the NMI under the sovereignty
of the United States. Sablan v. Inos, 3 N.M.I. 418 (1993).
The Covenant is an agreement entered into between the United
States government and the government and people of the Northern
Mariana Islands. The parties entered into agreement as two
separate but equal sovereign entities. The Covenant governs
the relationship between the parties. Sablan v. Inos, 2
N.M.I. 388 (1991).
The Covenant may be amended or terminated only by agreement
of the parties to the Covenant, or as provided in Covenant,
but not by unilateral action. Covenant § 105. Sablan
v. Inos, 2 N.M.I. 388 (1991).
The Covenant is a permanent, binding and solemn agreement
entered into between two sovereign peoples. Wabol v. Villacrusis,
1 N.M.I. 34 (1989), rev'd, 11 F.3d 124 (9th Cir. 1993).
The Covenant is not just a simple contract. It is a binding
commitment by two peoples with certain provisions so sacrosanct
as to be unchangeable without the consent of both parties.
Wabol v. Villacrusis, 1 N.M.I. 34 (1989), rev'd, 11 F.3d
124 (9th Cir. 1993).
Purpose of the Covenant is to establish a self-governing
Commonwealth and to define the future relationship between
the NMI and the United States. Covenant preamble. Wabol
v. Villacrusis, 1 N.M.I. 34 (1989), rev'd, 11 F.3d 124 (9th
Cir. 1993).
All acts of U.S. Congress and NMI Legislature relevant
to Covenant should be interpreted consistent with Covenant,
unless a contrary intention is clear. Wabol v. Villacrusis,
1 N.M.I. 34 (1989), rev'd, 11 F.3d 124 (9th Cir. 1993).
NMI Supreme Court may not question the wisdom of an enactment
of the NMI Legislature when the legislature is within its
authority under the Covenant. Wabol v. Villacrusis, 1 N.M.I.
34 (1989), rev'd, 11 F.3d 124 (9th Cir. 1993).
Whereas, the Charter of the United Nations and the Trusteeship
Agreement between the Security Council of the United Nations
and the United States of America guarantee to the people
of the Northern Mariana Islands the right freely to express
their wishes for self-government or independence; and
Whereas, the United States supports the desire of the people
of the Northern Mariana Islands to exercise their inalienable
right of self-determination; and
Whereas, the people of the Northern Mariana Islands and
the people of the United States share the goals and values
found in the American system of government based upon the
principles of government by the consent of the governed,
individual freedom and democracy; and
Whereas, for over twenty years, the people of the Northern
Mariana Islands, through public petition and referendum,
have clearly expressed their desire for political union
with the United States; Now, therefore, the Marianas Political
Status Commission, being the duly appointed representative
of the people of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Personal
Representative of the President of the United States have
entered into this Covenant in order to establish a self-governing
commonwealth for the Northern Mariana Islands within the
American political system and to define the future relationship
between the Northern Mariana Islands and the United States.
This Covenant will be mutually binding when it is approved
by the United States, by the Mariana Islands District Legislature
and by the people of the Northern Mariana Islands in a plebiscite,
constituting on their part a sovereign act of self-determination.
Case Annotations: Wabol v. Villacrusis, 1 N.M.I. 34--41;
Sablan v. Inos, 2 N.M.I. 388-- 395; Sablan v. Inos, 3 N.M.I.
418--429.
|